Saturday, July 31, 2010

Module Four Postings

I posted to Andree Simmons and Richard Wasserman's blogs.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Module 4: Engaging Learners with New Strategies and Tools



With your graphic organizer, include a reflection describing how you can bring the technological tools learners are using outside the classroom into the educational process, and which tools and strategies are best for this purpose.

There was article written an author by the name of Marc Prensky that I had to read for an assignment when I was working on my master’s degree. I often refer back to the article because it provides me with a reminder of how our educational system is steadily changing in order to meet the needs of the “Digital Natives” as Prensky refers to them. Digital Natives are native speakers of the digital language (Prensky, 2001 p.1) Prensky (2001 p.1) also says,” Those of us who were not born into the digital world but have, at some later point in our lives, become fascinated by and adopted many or most aspects of the new technology are, known as , Digital Immigrants. Prensky (2001, p2) believes the single biggest problem facing education today is that Digital Immigrant instructors, who speak an outdated language (that of the pre-digital age), are struggling to teach a population that speaks an entirely new language. With that being said, In order to have students actively participate and learn the content, I have to make decisions regarding planning based on the technology interest of my students. My graphic organizer reflects some technological tools that could be incorporated in the classroom. Under the category of content, virtual field trips, multimedia presentations, digital libraries, and Internet Inquiry projects are all ways for students to gain content knowledge. Blogs, emailing, Wikis, and discussion boards are common tools that can be used for communicating online. Each of them allow for engaging in communication with peers and instructors. Lastly, tools that can be incorporate for collaboration are Google Doc, Skype, Web 2.0, and podcasting.

References

Durrington, V., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190-193. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.

Prensky, M.(2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon (MCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Module 3- Assessing Collaborative Efforts

How should participation in a collaborative learning community be assessed?
The educator should utilize varies tools. Both the video by George Siemens and the book Collaboration Online states assessing students on line is a challenge and the task should not be solely completed by the educator. According to George Siemens (2010) there are a couple of ways participation can be assessed in a collaborative learning community. One way is peer assessment. This is the process of allowing students to assess each other. Another way to assess participation is by having students participate in online communities. This allows students to form different relationships with other experts and receive feedback and comments (Siemens, 2010). Palloff & Pratt suggest using a rubric to assess participation(Pallof &Pratt ,2005). In closing, there is not one perfect way to assess participation in a collaborative learning community. Therefore, it is important for the instructor to have multiple tools already in place to assess the participation.
The varying levels of skill and knowledge students bring to a course affect the instructor's "fair and equitable assessment" of learning because it pushes the instructor to be flexible when determining what is a valid indication of competence (Siemens, 2010).
When working with a student that does not want to network or collaborate in a learning community the instructor’s role, as the authors Pallof &Pratt (2005) stated should be that of a “playground monitor.” The instructor should monitor the progress and step in when he/she sees fit and assess each student accordingly. Next it is important to understand and respect the feelings of that member. As George Siemens stated in the video, many people during their academic learning have been solely dependent upon themselves now they are having to make an adjustment and work with others. This may not be an easy transition (Siemens, 2010). One thing, I think would be important for the students to do is try to build trust with the reluctant participant. In the video, George (2010) states that in order for people to work together there have to be a high level of trust. The members could continue on with the task and allow the student to join in when he/she reaches a level of comfort.

Reference:

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2010). Distance Education: Learning communities featuring Dr. George Siemens [DVD]. United States: Walden University.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Storyboard Layout

Scene 1
Shot description:
Anticipatory Setting
Effects/Graphics:
Short clip of a person:
-Frantically trying to find something to wear,
-Pumping gas
-Tireless looking for a parking space
-Rushing in to sit in a meeting
Dialog & Narration:
Discuss the hassle of having to find clothing, purchase gas, find a parking space, and sit in a long meeting

Scene 2
Shot description:
Anticipatory Setting
Audio:
TBD
Effects/Graphics:
Flash the text: Out with the OLD
Have a short clip of a person throwing clothing over their shoulder and tossing car keys on a table
Dialog & Narration:
Announce: “Out with the old”

Scene 3
Shot description:
Anticipatory Setting
Audio:
TBD
Effects/Graphics:
Flash the text: In with the NEW
Shots of a person jumping into bed with pj’s on and pulling out their laptop
Dialog & Narration:
Announce” In with the new”

Scene 4
Shot description:
Introduction
Audio:
TBD
Effects/Graphics:
Flash pictures of different online collaboration tools
(Wiki, Blogging, Google docs, You Tube, and etc.)
Dialog & Narration:
Discuss how collaboration models have changed

Scene 5
Shot description:
Introduction
Audio:
TBD
Effects/Graphics:
Flash the title COLLABORATION
Dialog & Narration:
Announce” Collaboration 21st Century style, the new way to communicate”

Scene 6
Shot description:
Introduction of Speakers
Audio:
TBD
Effects/Graphics:
Pictures of Karen and Gina flashing as the introductions are given
Dialog & Narration:
Introduce the guest speakers , Karen Blumberg and Gina Marcel
Provide background information on both speakers

Scene 7 and 8
Shot description:
Research (My focus may be on Google Apps, I still do not know the direction I am going to take)
Audio:
TBD
Effects/Graphics:
Shots of college students in a computer lab using collaboration tools
Shots of teachers in their classroom using collaboration tools
Shots of elementary students in the classroom using collaboration tools
Dialog & Narration: (No necessarily in this order)
Highlight findings from the research on collaboration
Highlight how we use technology to collaborate
Discuss the different collaboration tools ( strengths and weaknesses)

Scene 9
Shot description:
Closing
Audio:
Find some type of music
Effects/Graphics:
Roll credits and references
Dialog & Narration:
NONE